Wednesday, September 30, 2009

21st Century Skills


I have been exploring the website of Partnership for 21st Century Skills at www.21stcenturyskills.org. I agree with the mission of the organization, which is to bridge schools, community, and government together in order to help students master 21st century skills that they will need in order to be successful in the future workforce. There is a variety of resource material available for teachers to sort through on the site, by content area, state standards (although limited to 11 states), assessment, and professional development, to name a few. I was able to sift through some of the resources on the site and found it to be a somewhat confusing layout. I am not sure teachers would have a lot of time to muddle through all of the resources to find something useful. I did appreciate the ability to search resources by ratings and editors pick and by title, but still found it difficult to get to good ‘meat.’ The foundational information for each state represented was reflected what was stated in the P21 mission. Unfortunately I became frustrated with the site, as it often prevented me from using the back browser and I had to restart the website in order to explore more. What was surprising about the site was the volume of ‘big names’ listed as members of the council, including, but not limited to Pearson, Intel, Adobe, Blackboard, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Dell, Ford, Hewlett Packard, Lego, McGraw-Hill, Microsoft, NEA, Scholastic Education, Sesame Street, Verizon, and Walt Disney. I felt like some of the statements made on the site were too absolute. For instance the ‘Mission of the High School’ on one of the state links indicated that high-performing high schools were those that, essentially, understood the needs of high school students and were able to meet those needs better than other schools. I think it is important to remember that some schools have more “fortunate kids” than others, and, therefore, more access to technology and resources than schools that have a heavier population of “deprived kids.” It is not fair to make such absolute statements when not taking into account the demographics of schools, as well as the economic situation of school systems. Having said that, I wholeheartedly believe that teachers today have a responsibility to their students to do what they can to prepare them with the skills necessary to be successful in the 21st century workforce. This means closing the gap between schools and within schools and providing meaningful opportunities for all students to be successful. I know that the way I must teach today is not what I remember thinking teaching would be like when I was a little girl. I have only started my ninth year teaching, but things are still very different in my middle school as an educator than my middle school as a student. I must go with the changing times and do what I can to support my students and help them become tomorrow’s leaders. If this means learning new things that might make me a little uncomfortable now in order to provide them with opportunities that will help them be successful, then so be it. It is, after all, the goal of an educator…to do all that can be done for the greater good of our students!

3 comments:

  1. Do you think this website is promoting greater use of technology by all schools? I was under the impression that the states that committed to this idea were supposed to bring legislators and educators together to figure out how to improve the technology in schools and then improve the professional development opportunities for teachers so they knew how to use the new technology. My question is, who is paying for this? If the state legislature is coming up with the money, why can they not do this without committing to the P21 mission? Maybe a better question is why have they not done this already? I agree with your statement about teachers having a responsibility to prepare their students for the future. So how can this task best be completed?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you about trying to close the gap and teaching is not what it used to be. I believe that we have to not only teach but entertain students as they are learning. I believe technology is the way of life for these kids and that we need to be teaching them about it in order to keep up with their way of life. I also agree with you about the difference between students and their social economic level. It doesn’t mean teachers are worst at those schools just that they have to do much more work to get their students where they need to be. That will look different today then it use to…It will also look different at different schools.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really appreciated the critique that you made of the website. I was hesitant to make the same observations, but will gladly agree! For a technology centered website it seemed awfully difficult to navigate.

    Furthermore, I thought your discussion regarding the student demographic differences. It seems to me that easy technology access at home would lead to a much more adept clientele than one that lacked those same resources but taught the same curriculum.

    ReplyDelete