Friday, June 25, 2010

Reflection: Teaching New Literacy Skills in the Classroom


Integrating the teaching of new literacy skills into my 8th grade science curriculum is not only necessary, but it seems that it will be rather seamless. This might be the most striking revelation I have had as a result of taking my most recent master’s class, “Supporting Information Literacy and Online Inquiry in the Classroom.” Rather than this being “just another thing” to add to my often overwhelming list of “things to do” during the school year, this course has provided a platform on which to do the things I already do, or that I must do, better.

In developing a lesson plan for teaching new literacy skills, I was able to think critically about each moment of learning in the classroom. One of the most difficult parts of developing my lesson plan was in determining my methods for assessing student acquisition of new literacy skills…how am I going to KNOW that they have learned what they need to in order to effectively use new literacy skills in the classroom, and in their daily lives, not just in playing with information, as they might on social networking sites, but in working with information to accomplish something with meaning and purpose (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008)?

One professional development goal that I have deals with a recent opportunity I had to attend Space Academy for Educators, sponsored by Honeywell, at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, AL. First, let me encourage all math, science, and technology teachers to apply for this amazing opportunity…it was life-changing for me! There are many, many ways for me to integrate what I have learned in this master’s course with what I learned and experienced at Space Academy with what I currently teach. The goal of the Space Academy program is to inspire teachers to inspire students to excel in the areas of STEM education (science, technology, engineering, and math). The space program needs today’s students to be tomorrow’s experts if the U.S. is to continue to be a world leader. Inquiry-based learning provides the framework and platform for students to master new literacy skills, as well as content skills, needed to accomplish their goals. I plan to continue to develop my proficiency in using new literacy skills myself by conducting research, performing searches using the techniques I have learned in this course, and using the results of my searches to make things happen. Additionally, I would like to use new literacy skills to integrate new skills and lessons learned during my time at Space Academy to inspire my students in STEM education areas. When my students see me getting excited about learning and using what I am learning to make change happen and to do great things, then perhaps they will be inspired to do the same!

References:
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008). Program 13. Supporting Information Literacy and Online Inquiry in the Classroom [Motion picture]. “It’s Not about the Technology”. Baltimore: Author.


U.S. Space and Rocket Center
Huntsville, AL

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Evaluating Research Methods

Scenario 1: Ten students are available for in-depth interviews. Participants will be selected based on their involvement with the peer mediation program. They will be observed over three weeks. Analysis will attempt to determine issues concerning peer mediation.

Analysis: I have identified this research method as a Qualitative Case-Study, as it uses face-to-face methods of data-collection, it is narrative in nature, observation-based, and tells a story with a focus on a particular issue (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008).

Scenario 2: Two classrooms of students are selected. There are 30 students in each class; each group will have similar demographics—age, sex, race, socio-economic background, etc. Classes will be randomly divided into two groups of 15 students. Of these two groups, one randomly selected group will get training on peer mediation and the other group will not. Thus in each classroom there will be one group that is trained in peer mediation and one that is not. Analysis will occur on which groups have the fewest office referrals.

Analysis: I have identified this research method as Quantitative True Experimental. Random sampling is done to choose students so that there are no major differences between groups. The subjects are students in two classrooms, the target population is groups of fifteen students with similar demographics, and the sample is chosen at random. Additionally, the research is being used to “determine the effect of one factor on another” (McMillan & Schumacher, 2008, pp. 24 & 103).



Scenario 3: A school counselor is interested in knowing how student attitudes affect the value of peer mediation to decrease the number of office referrals that are being filed for inappropriate interactions.

Analysis: I have identified this research as Action-Research. The focus is to determine the influence of attitude on the value of peer mediation. Data is collected through a counselor and by a method deemed appropriate by them. The data is then analyzed and a program is put into place, with the purpose being to reduce office referrals (McMillan & Schumacher, 2008, pp. 174-177).

Scenario 4: Peer mediation has become widely used in many schools. The feelings of those involved in the process are little known—either from those doing the mediation or those receiving it. The ZASK-R Acceptance Preference Survey will be given as pre- and post-tests to 40 students participating in mediation. Follow-up interviews will be conducted on a bi-monthly basis.

Analysis: I have identified this research method as Explanatory Design Mixed-Method. Quantitative data is first collected and analyzed. This data is explained by qualitative data collected through follow-up interviews after the post-test (McMillan & Schumacher, 2008, pp. 162).

References:

McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2008) Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (Laureate custom edition). Boston: Pearson.

Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008). Program five. Quantitative Research Methods [Motion picture]. Introduction to educational research.. Baltimore: Author.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Research Questions and Methodology

Continuing off of last week’s work in developing a research problem statement, this week I have worked to develop research questions which will help me to identify the method for my research. First, let me restate my research problem statement:

I plan to determine the impact of an attendance call-out system for secondary school students on the number of unexcused tardies when compared with schools that do not use a call-out system.

Who: secondary students
What: schools that use an attendance call-out system and those that do not use a call-out system
Why: determine the impact on the number of unexcused tardies

Research Questions:

1. What attendance call-out programs exist for secondary schools? (Descriptive)
2. What is the relationship between the use of a call-out system and the number of unexcused tardies? (Relationship)
3. Is there a difference between the number of unexcused tardies for schools that have a call-out system and schools that do not? (Difference)
4. What is the timeframe for implementing a call-out system before a change in tardies was noted? (Descriptive)
5. What is the cost for implementing a call-out system? (Descriptive)
6. Do the benefits of a call-out system outweigh the cost of implementing it? (Relationship?)

Based on these research questions, I have determined that the method of research that best fits my problem is the Quantitative Nonexperimental Comparative Method. I have chosen this method because it is described by McMillan and Schumacher (2008) as a design in which the researcher determines if a difference between two or more groups exists in relation to that which is being studied (p. 25). The focus of my research would be to determine if schools that utilize an attendance program which generates parent contact (phone, email, etc.) have lower numbers of unexcused tardies than schools that do not utilize such a program.

I welcome suggestions and comments so that I know if I am on the right track...thanks for visiting!

References:
McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2008) Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (Laureate custom edition). Boston: Pearson.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Educational Research Problem

As part of my master’s program I am enrolled in Introduction to Educational Research. The first step in the research process involves developing a problem statement about an area I would like to research in technology and education. Following is my problem statement:


I plan to determine the impact of an attendance call-out system for secondary school students on the number of unexcused tardies when compared with schools that do not use a call-out system.

Who: secondary students
What: schools that use an attendance call-out system and those that do not use a call-out system
Why: determine the impact on the number of unexcused tardies


Sunday, February 28, 2010

Reflection: Bridging Technology and Instruction

When I reflect on my personal theory of learning that I developed at the beginning of this course, I find that my ideas about how I think students learn have not really changed that much. Rather, I have a better understanding about how to use technology to reach a greater number of learners at one time. My personal theory of learning is built around the Constructionism/Constructivism learning theory. At the core of this learning theory is the belief that the learning process leads to knowledge being constructed, or built, and that this knowledge will be constructed differently, depending on the experiences that each individual brings to the classroom, because of their own mental processes during the learning process (Lever-Duffy & McDonald, 2008, p. 16-17). At the same time, however, I also believe that teachers must be willing to change and adapt their theory of learning in order to meet the diverse needs of their students. Therefore, I do not just have one theory about how students learn, but rather multiple theories about how various students learn. While I might pinpoint the Constructionism/Constructivism learning theory as one that is at the core of my theory of student learning, it is not the only theory to which I hold.

In the Constructionism/Constructivism learning theory a teacher might encourage students to spiral back to what they have learned in order to build upon previous learning (Lever-Duffy & McDonald, 2008, p. 19). I make connections between previous learning and prior knowledge so that they learn to see the big picture in what we are studying. With regard to the Behaviorism theory, I believe that rules and procedures that students learn in the classroom are the result of an environmental response. Students learn which behaviors are appropriate when they receive a certain response (rewards or punishments) or lack of response from those in the classroom (Lever-Duffy & McDonald, 2008, p. 15). The response or need to refrain from a response will be different, depending on the uniqueness of the classroom and individuals in it. There are also elements of the Cognitivist and Social Constructionist learning theories, as well as Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences (Orey, 2001), that also complement my personal theory. I firmly believe that everyone does possess each of the nine intelligences in some degree, but there is one or more intelligence that dominates an individual’s learning and processing, thus leading to an individual learning profile. Because of this I strive to develop various ways for students to demonstrate mastery of their learning.

Immediate ways that I would like to integrate technology into my instructional practice is in the use of Microsoft Word Clip Art as a technology tool for nonlinguistic representations. I would like students to become comfortable in using this as a tool for finding nonlinguistic representations for their science vocabulary terms, as well as a way for me, as the teacher, to find nonlinguistic representations to use as I introduce new concepts to students. Nonlinguistic representations “enhance students’ ability to use mental images to represent and elaborate on knowledge…the more individuals use both types of representation (that in language and in mental images), the better they are able to reflect on and recall knowledge” (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007, p. 86). This is difficult for students to do on their own, so the more exposure they have in how to do this, the better they will be at using it to make their own meaning in what they are learning (Laureate Education, Inc., 2008).

I would also like to integrate VoiceThread as a platform for students to discuss issues or concepts that they study in science. I think this would beboth engaging and easy to teach, as it parallels some of the ways my students network socially, such as Facebook, MySpace, and Instant Messaging, but would be a new learning component to their social networks. I can envision my students being more excited to discuss or make comments about something posted on a class VoiceThread, as opposed tto the way a discussion might play out in a traditional classroom. It would provide options for the level at which students choose to participate (by video, voice, or text-chat) or are able to participate, given their access to technology at home, as well as their own comfort level. VoiceThread has the potential to take classroom engagement and participation to a new, deeper level.

When I think about my long-term goals for integrating technology into my instructional practice, I would like for online discussions to become the norm in my class. This could be carried out on a discussion board, wiki, blog, or VoiceThread…the options are endless, and would depend on the students in my classes, and may vary from class-to-class, depending on the maturity level of my students, as well as their comfort-level with technology. In order to start this, I just need to make a decision about which platform to start with, and just start! I just need to start this as a discussion mode, and then I think the paths that I choose and the technology that should be used will become clear to me, and my students. I also think that if I use this as a way to integrate technology into my instructional practice, then more doors for integrating it in other ways will be opened. The important thing is that I take the steps necessary to help my students be more comfortable using technology in ways that will help prepare them for the future.

References:
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008). Program eleven. Instructional Strategies, Part One [Motion picture]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Baltimore: Author.

Lever-Duffy, J. & McDonald, J. (2008). Teaching and learning with technology (3rd ed. pp. 2–35). Boston: Pearson.

Orey, M. (Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page

Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

View my VoiceThread about graffiti in today's schools:

http://voicethread.com/share/889831/

I am looking for ideas on how to encourage respect for property in my middle school students...click to view my VoiceTread above. Thanks!

Cooperative Learning and Social Learning Theories

Today’s students are Digital Natives, ready to plug into just about anything that involves technology AND requires that they interact socially with their peers. How much better could cooperative learning fit with today’s learners than almost any other instructional strategy? According to Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, and Malenoski, “to be prepared for the fast-paced, virtual workplace that they will inherit, today’s students need to be able to learn and produce cooperatively” (2007, p. 139).
Cooperatively learning is “a teaching strategy which allows students to work together in small groups with individuals of various talents, abilities, and backgrounds to accomplish a common goal” (Orey, 2001). This seems like reality-based learning to me! In today’s workplace, an individual is usually part of a team that works together to accomplish a task or series of tasks, and the success of the team depends on all of the members of the team. After all, “cooperative learning is not so much learning to cooperate as it is cooperating to learn” (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, and Malenoski, 2007, p. 143). The integration of web resources, such as WebQuests, shared bookmarking, Blackboard, and simulation games, as well as communication software such as blogs and wikis, reinforce collaborative skills that students in today’s schools must learn in order to be prepared to enter the workforce and network effectively as adults (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, and Malenoski, 2001). It is better that students develop and practice these 21st century skills now, rather than later, when they are in a competitive workforce and it really counts!


References:
Orey, M.(Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page

Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.